Data Comparison Program – Postal Service and Public Sex Offender Registries
ACTION: Notice of Data Comparison Program – Postal Service and public sex offender registries via the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Web site maintained by the Department of Justice.
SUMMARY: The United States Postal Service® (Postal Service) plans to conduct an ongoing data comparison program to identify any current Postal Service employees who are required by law to register on a public registry of sex offenders. These registries contain information about individuals who are statutorily required to register, having committed offenses of sexual violence against adults or children, certain other crimes against victims who are minors, or other comparable offenses. Under the guidelines created by the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Walsh Act), the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Web site (NSOPW) was created and coordinated by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) as a cooperative effort between the agencies hosting public sexual offender registries and the Federal government. The NSOPW is a search tool allowing a user to submit a single national query to obtain information about sex offenders through a number of search options. The Postal Service has procured software that enables it to conduct multiple simultaneous queries of the NSOPW via a secure line to the DOJ NSOPW.
The software queries the public registries for each employee and returns a match, if found, to a secured database. No Postal Service employee information is ever shared with the DOJ or stored outside of the Postal Service’s control. The Postal Service will compare its payroll database of current employees against public records using the NSOPW search tool. The Postal Service is undertaking this initiative to ascertain the suitability of individuals for certain positions or employment and to protect the integrity of its brand.
DATES: The comparison program will become effective no sooner than 30 days after notice of the comparison program is published in the Federal Register and sent to the DOJ, Congress, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The comparison program will be ongoing.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this proposal should be mailed or delivered to the Records Office, Postal Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Room 5846, Washington, DC 20260–5353. Copies of all written comments will be available at the above address for public inspection and photocopying between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Eyre at 202–268–2608.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Postal Service seeks to provide the public with accurate and efficient mail delivery to the more than 144 million businesses and residences in this country. Given the public nature of the Postal Service, published standards of conduct for Postal Service employees prohibit any employee from engaging in criminal, dishonest, or similar prejudicial conduct. The Postal Service plans to extract records for each current employee (first and last name, city of residence, state, and ZIPTM Code) from its Privacy Act System of Records (USPS 100.400), Personnel Compensation and Payroll Records, and will compare the records with public sex offender records using the NSOPW search tool maintained by the DOJ under the authority of the Walsh Act. The NSOPW search tool accesses databases of public information about individuals who have been required as a matter of law to register on a sexual offender public registry. This comparison program does not constitute a computer matching program, subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act, because the Postal Service is comparing data in its own Privacy Act Systems of Records with publicly available records. Records will not be disclosed to any other agency for purposes of this comparison.
Nevertheless, the Postal Service is providing public notice of the proposed program and will conduct the program in the manner described below to ensure that the interests of postal employees are fully protected. After extensively verifying the accuracy of the information, the Postal Service will use the data to determine whether the reported offenses may impact an individual’s suitability for certain positions or employment and to protect the integrity of the Postal Service’s brand. The Postal Service will analyze each occurrence on a case-bycase basis to determine the appropriate action to take, if any. In this regard, the Postal Service will consider the seriousness of the offense, the date of the offense, the nature of the employee’s position with the Postal Service, and any other factors that may be relevant to the individual case.
The Postal Service will make extensive efforts to ensure that the data is accurate. Postal Inspectors will review the match report in order to verify that the person identified via the NSOPW is in fact a Postal Service employee. A postal inspector will then determine whether the person is properly included on the public registry by reviewing the relevant facts about the offense from information furnished by relevant law enforcement agencies, such as the arresting agency. The postal inspector will refer instances where the employee failed to provide any required notice of the offense to Postal Service management, or other instances considered employee misconduct, to the Office of Inspector General (OIG). The inspector or OIG special agent will prepare an investigative memorandum or report of investigation, respectively, which will be sent to the individual employee’s installation head. The installation head will ensure that a caseby- case analysis is conducted regarding the appropriate action to be taken. The Postal Service will provide at least 30 days advance notice prior to the initiation of any adverse action against a matched individual (unless the Postal Service determines that public health or safety may be affected or threatened pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(p)(3)).
The privacy of employees will be safeguarded and protected. The Postal Service will manage all data in strict accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974. Data extracted from the relevant Postal Service System of Records (USPS 100.400) for comparison will not be shared with the DOJ, state agencies, territories, Indian Nations, or any other person or organization, except as authorized by the Privacy Act or required by the Freedom of Information Act. Any verified data that is maintained will be managed within the parameters of the Privacy Act System of Records USPS 700.000, Inspection Service Investigative File System (last published April 29, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 82)); and, for cases referred to the OIG, data that is maintained will also be managed within the parameters of Privacy Act System of Records USPS 700.300, Inspector General Investigative Records (last published June 14, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 114)). Key privacy features of the data comparison program include the following:
• Requiring that the identity of matched individuals be verified and that the relevant facts of the offense be confirmed;
• Requiring appropriate security controls for the comparison;
• Providing protections for employees who appear as an initial match but who are not subsequently verified as belonging on the state registry of offenders; and
• Requiring the Postal Service to complete the verification and provide at least 30 days advance notice prior to the initiation of any adverse action against a matched individual (unless the Postal Service determines that public health and safety may be affected or threatened pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(p)(3), or as otherwise provided by 5 U.S.C. 7513(b), relevant collective bargaining provisions, and Postal Service regulations).
Neva Watson, Attorney, Legislative
Federal Register Notice
Filed by USPS 12.08.09
I strongly agree that past crimes do not define who and what a person is today. The biggest finger pointers are sex offenders themselves, they just never got caught…yet!
P.S. – This article is eight years old now and the USPS still allows registered sexual offenders to be delivery people–they weren’t “rooted out”, stupid author of this article.
Iam a registered sex offender and have been since 2004. I committed a sex offense, but it was something I did not who I am. I became friends with a drug dealer during a dark period of my life who happened to be only fourteen; however, he was a hard looking young man full of tatoos and shaved head with a scar across head from gang rivals. This young man brought my choice of drugs and used them as a ploy to get sex from me. My bad choice was not made out of an uncontrollable act of sexual deviant needs, but from a desire to get the drug and possible future drugs. I am now a life time offender that must register every 3 months. I have gotten every job I have ever applied for and been a veryhonest, trustworth, hard working loyal employee to all my superiors. I have acquired an associates degree in psychology which is my major and am now a bachelor of science in psychology. I am not a risk factor to the community and do not have a tendancy to be attracted to teen boys. Should I be denied to work somewhere I am qualified?
This is retarded, where do you expect sex offenders to work. Most people have commented a sex offense in their life but not got in trouble, peeing in public for example.
Recently retired. During my career there was so much sexually oriented behavior that I believed it was part of the job requirement like wearing a postal uniform. Little or nothing was ever done to stop the offending behavior in fact it seemed to be encouraged by male and female and especially on the management level.
After retiring with 38 years of service with the PO I still feel it is the best service in the world. I enjoyed my career with the PO but it sure has changed. With the computer age taking over I think the PO should be able to get rid of a lot of supervosors since it is too top heavy with management. Way too heavy.
How about the class action lawsuit in NY the charges LI MTEC Allen Richie supervisors forcing female employees to have sex with them so they can keep their jobs. article appeared in LI Newsady and most national TV news programs!!! Allen richie is a USPS contractor!!!
Why stop there! How about those employees that have had three owi’s and have been charged with having marijuana and come into work stoned?
if this is initiated most supervisory personell will have to register i would thing approximately 30% no lie ps tiger woods is a former supervisor! ha ha!
Ummm,
Our installation head was recently removed after his involvement in several years of sexual harassment charges. He is currently in prison. I know this sound like a joke but unfortunately I am not kidding.
” The installation head will ensure that a case-by-case analysis is conducted regarding the appropriate action to be taken.” Yah, right!
Thanks Don – I agree.
All they have to do is search the national sex offender web site. This is just political correctness on the part of the USPS. Check people out before hiring, including casuals. They are making it out to be more than it is.