{"id":4375,"date":"2012-05-10T22:33:58","date_gmt":"2012-05-11T03:33:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/?p=4375"},"modified":"2012-05-10T22:33:58","modified_gmt":"2012-05-11T03:33:58","slug":"apwu-says-address-postal-reform-now-start-with-senate-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/2012\/05\/10\/apwu-says-address-postal-reform-now-start-with-senate-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"APWU Says Address Postal Reform Now, Start With Senate Bill"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a class=\"highslide\" onclick=\"return vz.expand(this)\" href=\"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/APWU-News3.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-4377\" title=\"APWU-News\" src=\"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/APWU-News3-150x150.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>As the May 15 expiration of a moratorium on the closure of post offices and mail processing facilities approaches, the APWU is urging the House of Representatives to address postal reform immediately, and to use the Senate bill as a starting point. The USPS\u2019 May 9 announcement about keeping rural offices open isn\u2019t binding and won\u2019t solve the USPS financial crisis, so we must keep fighting, the union says.<\/p>\n<p>The attention of lawmakers, postal workers and customers shifted to the House after the Senate passed a bi-partisan postal bill (S. 1789) on April 25, but, so far, House leaders have displayed no sense of urgency in addressing the issue. As CNN Money reported on April 27, \u201cAides say Republican leaders don\u2019t feel pressured to take up the House bill right away, because they\u2019re not worried about postal closures.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But the union, postal customers and many legislators see things differently. \u201cWe cannot allow legislative inaction to force the USPS to implement drastic cuts that will destroy the nation\u2019s mail system, damage service, and jeopardize tens of thousands of jobs,\u201d said APWU President Cliff Guffey.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI encourage all union members to contact their representatives and urge them to consider postal reform legislation immediately. Be sure to ask them to use the Senate bill as a starting point,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Senate Bill<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Senate bill is flawed,\u201d Guffey said, \u201cbut it is much better than an earlier version \u2014 and it is infinitely better than the bill that was approved by a House Committee last year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe improvements to the Senate bill are the result of the efforts of postal workers, customers, and legislators who recognize the importance of the USPS to American life \u2014 and have fought to protect it,\u201d he said. \u201cWe now must apply the same determination to the House.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The APWU is seeking several improvements to the Senate bill:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Strengthen the language that addresses congressional mandates that are bankrupting the USPS;<\/li>\n<li>Improve the protections of service standards, which are essential to preserving the Postal Service and postal jobs, and<\/li>\n<li>Eliminate provisions that would have devastating consequences for the thousands of postal and federal employees who were injured on the job and who receive compensation from the Office of Workers Compensation Program (OWCP).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u201cDespite the weaknesses of the Senate bill, it would provide the USPS with short-term financial relief, and it would allow more community input in the decision-making processing for closing or consolidating post offices and postal facilities,\u201d Guffey said. It also would give the Postal Regulatory Commission authority to reverse USPS decisions on closures and consolidations.<\/p>\n<p><strong>House Bill Would Destroy USPS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>H.R. 2309, the bill that was approved by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, would \u201cdestroy the Postal Service as we know it,\u201d the union president said. \u201cWe must not allow it to serve as the starting point for discussion in the House.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The bill, which was sponsored by Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA), and Rep. Dennis Ross (R-FL), would require the USPS to implement $3 billion worth of cuts in post offices and mail processing facilities in a two-year period, and would slash \u201cdoor delivery.\u201d The bill also would gut collective bargaining \u2014 prohibiting postal unions and the USPS from negotiating protection against layoffs and allowing an appointed board to reject labor contracts it considers too costly.<\/p>\n<p>The APWU enthusiastically supports another House bill, H.R. 1351, introduced by Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA). The legislation has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.apwu.org\/issues-uspsfinances\/cosponsors-hr1351.htm\" target=\"_blank\">227 co-sponsors<\/a>, which constitutes a majority of House members, but Rep. Issa has refused to allow a vote on the measure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As the May 15 expiration of a moratorium on the closure of post offices and mail processing facilities approaches, the APWU is urging the House of Representatives to address postal reform immediately, and to use the Senate bill as a starting point. The USPS\u2019 May 9 announcement about keeping rural offices open isn\u2019t binding and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4375","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apwu-news","last_archivepost"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4375","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4375"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4375\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4379,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4375\/revisions\/4379"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}