{"id":14236,"date":"2016-02-26T08:34:41","date_gmt":"2016-02-26T13:34:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/?p=14236"},"modified":"2016-02-26T08:34:41","modified_gmt":"2016-02-26T13:34:41","slug":"apwu-nlrb-hearing-on-staples-deal-finally-gets-to-the-heart-of-the-matter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/2016\/02\/26\/apwu-nlrb-hearing-on-staples-deal-finally-gets-to-the-heart-of-the-matter\/","title":{"rendered":"APWU: NLRB Hearing on Staples Deal Finally Gets to the Heart of the Matter"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hearing Room is Cleared When Secret Documents Are Discussed<\/h4>\n
\n
\n

APWU – 02\/25\/2016<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

A National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) hearing on charges that the Postal Service illegally subcontracted work to Staples resumed on Feb. 24 \u2013 after months of procedural wrangling \u2013 and finally got to the substance of the dispute.<\/p>\n

In an opening statement, the APWU offered its perspective on the case: The Postal Service\u2019s decision to allow Staples employees to perform the work of USPS retail clerks was motivated in large part by management\u2019s desire to save money on labor costs. The union was never offered the opportunity to negotiate over the program, and therefore the USPS violated its duty to bargain in good faith.<\/p>\n

The Postal Service asserted that the goal was simply to expand customers\u2019 access to retail services and therefore, management had no obligation to bargain with the union over the program.<\/p>\n

But the first and only witness of the day, APWU Manager of Negotiations Support Phil Tabbita, testified about numerous USPS documents that revealed that management\u2019s goals in the Staples program included reducing labor costs by transferring the work of window clerks to Staples employees. He was questioned by NRLB Region 5 General Counsel Daniel M. Heltzer, who is representing the NLRB in the complaint against the Postal Service.<\/p>\n

The Postal Service\u2019s attorney repeatedly objected to the General Counsel\u2019s line of questioning, but Administrative Law Judge Paul Bogas overruled the majority of the objections.<\/p>\n

Observers Cleared<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Postal Service claimed that two of the internal documents were so confidential that the hearing room had to be cleared of observers before Tabbita could be questioned about them. Judge Bogas temporarily granted the request to keep the documents sealed, but said he would revisit the designation later. The judge\u2019s ruling prohibits the APWU from reporting on the documents, at least for now.<\/p>\n

Among the observers cleared from the hearing room were activists from New York, Philadelphia and Washington, DC, wearing\u00a0<\/span>Stop Staples\u00a0<\/span><\/em>T-shirts. \u201cWe came because we want to preserve postal jobs with good benefits and not give them to low-benefit jobs,\u201d said Carol Thomas, a retired Training Technician from New York. \u201cWe wanted to show our support for the cause,\u201d added Rosa Greene, a retired Window Clerk.<\/p>\n

\"\"
\n“Stop Staples” activists fron New York City.<\/h6>\n

\u201cThe Postal Service should end its dirty deal with Staples and stop efforts to privatize retail operations,\u201d said APWU President Mark Dimondstein. \u201cOur country deserves public postal services that are provided by well-trained USPS employees who are accountable to the people.\u201d<\/p>\n

The case arose after the APWU filed an Unfair Labor Practice charge with the NRLB. The hearing is expected to continue for several days.<\/p>\n

For background on the NLRB case, see:<\/em><\/p>\n

Secret Document Exposes USPS Privatization Planning<\/a><\/p>\n

Hearing on USPS-Staples Deal Dominated by Legal Wrangling<\/a><\/p>\n

USPS, Staples Produce a Mound of Documents<\/a><\/p>\n

NLRB Calls Interference on Staples<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Hearing Room is Cleared When Secret Documents Are Discussed APWU – 02\/25\/2016 A National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) hearing on charges that the Postal Service illegally subcontracted work to Staples resumed on Feb. 24 \u2013 after months of procedural wrangling \u2013 and finally got to the substance of the dispute. In an opening statement, the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":14238,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14236","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breaking","category-apwu-news","last_archivepost"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14236","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14236"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14236\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14237,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14236\/revisions\/14237"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14238"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}