{"id":1124,"date":"2010-06-30T18:24:05","date_gmt":"2010-06-30T23:24:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/?p=1124"},"modified":"2010-06-30T18:30:57","modified_gmt":"2010-06-30T23:30:57","slug":"usps-overcharged-by-50-billion-plus-for-csrs-benefits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/2010\/06\/30\/usps-overcharged-by-50-billion-plus-for-csrs-benefits\/","title":{"rendered":"USPS Overcharged by $50 Billion Plus for CSRS Benefits"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a class=\"highslide\" onclick=\"return vz.expand(this)\" href=\"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/06\/PRC-Report.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1125\" title=\"PRC Report\" src=\"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/06\/PRC-Report-150x150.gif\" alt=\"PRC Report\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>PRC Press Release<br \/>\nJune 30, 2010<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>PRC Report Finds $50 Billion Discrepancy<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Washington, DC \u2013 The Postal Regulatory Commission today submitted to Congress, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the United States Postal Service, an independent actuarial report on the allocation of the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) benefits paid to former Post Office Department employees.<\/p>\n<p>The Postal Service asked for an independent review of current allocations. The Commission report finds that an adjustment of $50-$55 billion in favor of the Postal Service would be equitable.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Commission is pleased to provide this expert and timely perspective to assist Congress and OPM as they work to resolve an issue that has far-reaching consequences for the financial health and viability of the Nation\u2019s universal mail system,\u201d said Chairman Ruth Y. Goldway.<\/p>\n<p>By law, OPM, which is responsible for calculating the Postal Service\u2019s CSRS pension liability, must now reconsider its calculation of the Postal Service\u2019s pension assets in light of this report, and submit the results of its reconsideration to the Commission, the Postal Service, and Congress.<\/p>\n<p>The Commission finds that the report, prepared by The Segal Company, provides a persuasive statement of how generally accepted accounting principles should be used to develop the current postal pension assets.<\/p>\n<p>The Commission suggests that Congress may wish to alter the schedule established in the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA) for potential transfers from the Postal Service Retirement Fund to its Retiree Health Benefit Fund. Currently, such transfers may not take place before September 30, 2015.<\/p>\n<p>The full report, Civil Service Retirement System Cost and Benefit Allocation Principles, is available on the Commission web site, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prc.gov\">www.prc.gov<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Read: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prc.gov\/prc-docs\/home\/whatsnew\/Report%20on%20CSRS%20Cost%20and%20Benefit%20Allocation%20Principles_1122.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Complete Report to PRC by The Segal Group, Inc<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Read: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prc.gov\/prc-docs\/home\/whatsnew\/CSRS%20transmittal%20ltr%20to%20Potter_1123.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">PRC Transmittal Letter to PMG Potter<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PRC Press Release June 30, 2010 PRC Report Finds $50 Billion Discrepancy Washington, DC \u2013 The Postal Regulatory Commission today submitted to Congress, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the United States Postal Service, an independent actuarial report on the allocation of the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) benefits paid to former Post Office [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breaking","last_archivepost"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1124"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1124\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1128,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1124\/revisions\/1128"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}