{"id":10576,"date":"2015-04-08T15:01:16","date_gmt":"2015-04-08T20:01:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/?p=10576"},"modified":"2015-04-08T15:32:37","modified_gmt":"2015-04-08T20:32:37","slug":"nlrb-slams-postal-service-for-failure-to-bargain-over-employee-data-breach","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/2015\/04\/08\/nlrb-slams-postal-service-for-failure-to-bargain-over-employee-data-breach\/","title":{"rendered":"NLRB Slams Postal Service For Failure to Bargain over Employee Data Breach"},"content":{"rendered":"
Complaint over Cyber Intrusion Would Set Precedent<\/div>\n
\n
\n

APWU News – 04\/08\/2015<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>–\u00a0<\/span><\/span>In a first-of-its-kind complaint, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has cited the Postal Service for failing to bargain with the APWU over last year\u2019s massive data security breach. The incident, which was revealed to the union and employees in mid-November, compromised the personal information of hundreds of thousands of current and former postal employees.<\/p>\n

As a result of the cyber intrusion, employees\u2019 Social Security numbers, addresses, dates of birth, and injury claim information were accessed from postal data systems over a period of months.\u00a0 In response, the Postal Service decided unilaterally to offer employees just one year of free credit reporting.<\/p>\n

Upon learning of the breach from then-Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe, APWU President Mark Dimondstein demanded that the Postal Service bargain with the union over the issue. The APWU also sought information from the Postal Service about the extent of the breach; what postal officials knew; when they knew it, and what they did or failed to do to protect employee information.<\/p>\n

The APWU filed the NLRB charge just days after learning of the cyber intrusion, after the Postal Service refused to bargain over management\u2019s response to the breach and failed to respond to the union\u2018s request for information.\u00a0 At the time, Dimondstein said, \u201cWe are outraged that this happened. We do not know at this point whether management did everything in their power to protect our privacy, but they bear the ultimate responsibility.\u201d<\/p>\n

The\u00a0<\/span>complaint<\/a>\u00a0<\/span>by Region 5 of the NLRB cites the Postal Service for ignoring its legal obligations to bargain with the union.<\/p>\n

\u201cBy issuing this complaint, the NLRB is recognizing employee rights in the information age,\u201d Dimondstein said.<\/p>\n

In a move typically reserved for the most intractable employers, the NLRB is seeking special remedies for the Postal Service\u2019s unlawful acts.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn view of the extensive history of repeated unfair labor practice violations found by the Board and courts,\u201d the complaint says, the NLRB is seeking an order \u201cto comprehensively address the Postal Service\u2019s violations of the law.\u201d<\/p>\n

The special remedies include a video featuring a top postal manager reading an NLRB-drafted notice to employees and an NLRB-imposed bargaining schedule, with regular progress reports and pay for union negotiators.<\/p>\n

The Postal Service has until mid-April to answer the complaint.\u00a0 A trial before an NLRB administrative law judge is expected to take place in May in Washington, DC.<\/p>\n

PLEASE NOTE: We cannot answer questions or concerns relating to this NLRB\/APWU\/USPS issue. PEN<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\"1-APWU-New\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Complaint over Cyber Intrusion Would Set Precedent APWU News – 04\/08\/2015\u00a0–\u00a0In a first-of-its-kind complaint, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has cited the Postal Service for failing to bargain with the APWU over last year\u2019s massive data security breach. The incident, which was revealed to the union and employees in mid-November, compromised the personal information […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10087,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breaking","category-apwu-news","last_archivepost"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10576"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10576\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10583,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10576\/revisions\/10583"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10087"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/postalemployeenetwork.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}