<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: USPS: Customers testing larger mailboxes	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://postalemployeenetwork.com/news/2015/03/18/usps-customers-testing-larger-mailboxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://postalemployeenetwork.com/news/2015/03/18/usps-customers-testing-larger-mailboxes/</link>
	<description>Postal News For Postal Employees And Retirees</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: egark		</title>
		<link>https://postalemployeenetwork.com/news/2015/03/18/usps-customers-testing-larger-mailboxes/comment-page-1/#comment-63249</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[egark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalemployeenetwork.com/news/?p=10366#comment-63249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A wonderful idea.  If the standard mailbox was even one inch bigger I could put about 10 more packages a day into the box, saving time and wear and tear on the old bones.  Amazingly, the standard box used to have a requirement of a 6x6 cross section but about 15 years ago the post office changed to to 5x6 to save manufacturing costs!  They made it smaller!  And then they wonder why the route takes longer.  And Amazon.com, our &quot;partner&quot;.  They used to have a box, probably for 1 or two CDs, a paperback, or other small items, that easily fit into a curbside box.  About two years ago their commonly used box got bigger, just too big by about a half an inch, to fit into boxes.  Do these people talk to each other?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wonderful idea.  If the standard mailbox was even one inch bigger I could put about 10 more packages a day into the box, saving time and wear and tear on the old bones.  Amazingly, the standard box used to have a requirement of a 6&#215;6 cross section but about 15 years ago the post office changed to to 5&#215;6 to save manufacturing costs!  They made it smaller!  And then they wonder why the route takes longer.  And Amazon.com, our &#8220;partner&#8221;.  They used to have a box, probably for 1 or two CDs, a paperback, or other small items, that easily fit into a curbside box.  About two years ago their commonly used box got bigger, just too big by about a half an inch, to fit into boxes.  Do these people talk to each other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
