Letter Carrier Union Responds To Trump Tweet

NALC – 1/9/18 – Over the holidays, the president mentioned the Postal Service in the following tweet:

While it is clear that the intended target was Amazon’s founder Jeff Bezos (who is also owner of The Washington Post), what is less clear is the reason for the sudden interest in the pricing of packages. It’s probably because of recent media attention resulting from a policy campaign by the United Parcel Service (UPS).

For more than 40 years, UPS has been trying relentlessly to force the Postal Service to raise parcel rates. If successful, this effort would essentially drive business away from the Postal Service and result in more volume at higher prices and greater profits for UPS – good for its shareholders, bad for American businesses and households.

Unlike its competitors, the Postal Service already is required, by federal law, to make a profit on every package it delivers – including those for Amazon.  Also unlike UPS and FedEx, the Postal Service is required by law to deliver to every address in the country six days a week.

If the president truly wants to make the Postal Service “smarter and richer,” he has the power to do so.

He can start by nominating a full slate of competent and qualified candidates to the Postal Service Board of Governors (BOG) and by filling a key vacancy on the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC). While the vacant BOG is a problem President Trump inherited, as of today he has offered only three nominations for the BOG, even though all nine seats are vacant. Meanwhile, the PRC, which is central to the Postal Service’s ability to set postage rates appropriately, is missing its fifth member. Indeed, sensible postal pricing hangs in the balance right now at the PRC as it works to create a new postage rate-setting system.

If the president wants to ultimately raise rates, it can be done only with a functioning Board of Governors and a Postal Regulatory Commission at full strength.

Beyond making these nominations, the most important thing the president can do to make the Postal Service smarter and stronger is to remove the crushing financial burden placed on the Postal Service by the 2006 congressional mandate to pre-fund future retiree health benefits decades in advance, something no other public agency or private company is required to do. This policy change, which President Trump’s predecessor did not achieve, has bipartisan support. It would immediately restore the constitutionally mandated Postal Service to financial stability, enabling it to continue to serve 155 million businesses and residences six (and sometimes seven) days a week while continuing to provide the most affordable postal rates in the industrial world.

2 Responses to "Letter Carrier Union Responds To Trump Tweet"

  1. Postal Joe   January 10, 2018 at 9:17 pm

    President Rolando,
    Please give us (aka USPS retirees) a break and cut the BS!!! You and your union have tried to screw USPS retirees out of our healthcare benefits for several years now by any means necessary for the benefit of your own union’s healthcare plan! The Postal Reform bill is dead, why not move on to something else…. like putting in for retirement!!!

  2. ralphie   January 12, 2018 at 3:32 pm

    Thank you Joe, as a soon to be retired carrier, it was shocking to me to see Rolando sell retirees down the road by endorsing that they pay for medicare and full price for the NALC HBP. Rolando would be collecting the full premium from retired carriers while having NALC become the secondary payer on all claims, reducing NALC liability. Rolando was to stupid to offer a carrier medicare advantage plan that would have the premium paid for by by the usps share paid to them. This would actually be a benefit to the USPS, NALC, and the retiree. Just look at what UHC offers for a medicare advantage plan with a $1500 max out of pocket.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.