Statement on H.R. 756 Postal Reform Act and the 2016 APWU National Election by Jerry Stidman

PEN Editor: The article below is courtesy of Jerry Stidman ran for APWU president in 2016.

Stidman: Statement on the 2016 APWU National Election and H.R. 756, Postal Reform Act of 2017


I appreciated the opportunity to enter a truly democratic process. Thank you to the 6618 APWU members who voted for me. Your voice will not go unheard.

First, I would like to congratulate Mark Dimondstein on the apparent election to his second term as American Postal Workers Union National President. Second, I also congratulate all candidates both who were successful in gaining office and those who may not have gotten the required votes to be sworn into an APWU office. Finally, thank you to all APWU members who chose to vote in our national election and those who did not because there will be a next time. I encourage all members to engage their union on issues that are close to their heart.

I sincerely need for all members to understand why I entered the 2016 election process and why I do not consider that entrance an effort in futility. My campaign began last April after APWU leadership announced the Legislative/Political Director would be moved into leading the APWU healthcare plan. This also included moving the longtime Retiree Director would be moved to lead the Legislative/Political Director’s role. All positions that were involved were elected positions by the membership. I considered this a travesty and a manipulation of the member’s democratic process. No explanation of why this change took place was ever given to the membership. It is important to understand the previous health plan director was paid a severance to retire. I spoke to that gentleman on the telephone and he told me he believed the current president supported a “postal only healthcare plan”. I would like to think there are more than 6618 who oppose a “postal only healthcare plan”. However, I can’t prove that yet.

I want to state my personal opposition to H.R. 756, the Postal Service Reform Act of 2017. This is a major concession on postal reform and one that will hurt all federal employees. It would appear the unions of the post office have adopted support of this legislation to improve their ability to sell their health insurance plans. I encourage all who follow, the members of all four postal unions and all who support a truly public post office to stand against H.R. 756 as well. This proposed legislation is not in the best interests of individual postal workers, customers of the post office, or those who support organized labor.

It is my deepest hope and desire all available people would use the NARFE letter on this issue to contact their Congressman. As time passes I am very confident there will be many articles written against H.R. 756, the Postal Service Reform Act of 2017. I encourage you to read them and consider the language in detail. Then make sure you share them with as many people as you possibly can on the internet and social media. Please sign and share the petitions I’ve written as well. I encourage labor activists to protest the Postal Reform Act of 2017 and call your Congressman. Do not leave any stone unturned in showing your opposition to this legislation.

The 2016 APWU National Election had numerous appeals to both the union and the Department of Labor. To the best of my knowledge the Department of Labor has not resolved all those appeals. The potential exists the final determination of this election may be decided in Federal Court. I deeply apologize for not addressing the APWU elections earlier. For the last few months it has been important to me not to compromise those who might still have active appeals to this election. The last thing I would ever want to do is compromise anyone’s position who might have strong aspirations to hold office in the future. Plus, with all the supposed results showing landslide victories for everyone who was pictured on Mark Dimondstein’s flyer I didn’t want those who drink the cool aide to scream “sour grapes” or “sore losers”.

You can trust I will be involved in the next APWU national election cycle. I am uncertain now exactly what that involvement may include. I have not ruled out running for President again. However, it is just as likely it may be in a different role. The one thing I am certain is I will oppose anyone who supports watershed legislation such as H.R. 756 the Postal Service Reform Act. This is a bad move for an incredibly long list of people that starts with the hard-working people of the post office. Leaders of the four postal unions and NAPS should be ashamed to have shown support for this proposed legislation. If enacted it will be just as devastating as H.R. 6407, the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 to the postal customer and the postal worker.

Source: 21st Century Postal Worker

4 Responses to "Statement on H.R. 756 Postal Reform Act and the 2016 APWU National Election by Jerry Stidman"

  1. disgusted postal retiree   February 13, 2017 at 1:37 pm

    Nice try brother!
    However your endeavors will be all for naught as long as we have the postal union political machine for each and every union in power. The active membershipis totally blind and obedient like little lambs being led to slaughter. totally meek and docile and unwilling to upset the union hierarchy. They accept whatever is given to them, grumble about it to
    each other but do nothing, like voting in some new leadership that cares about the membership and not themselves and their cronies. They union leaders take the salary given to them and ask for extra for political contributions to: AWU COPA, NPMHU PAC, NALC COLPCE, ETC. too which they spend as they see fit, while claiming money raised is being used to lobby the fat cat politicians, who are totally clueless on anything, except to lie and promise everything to get in or remain in office.
    Only when the union membership, active and retired look out for their own good, instead of
    buying into the lies of the union leadership, will you have any change at the top, and get some leadership that cares about the membership, both active and retired..

  2. Postal Joe   February 13, 2017 at 9:26 pm

    “Disgusted postal retiree” you are 100% correct!! Good Response!

  3. Postal Joe   February 14, 2017 at 9:36 pm

    It’s actually pretty sad….this guy ran for APWU president in 2016 and now he’s telling the membership to use an “NARFE” letter to contact our Congressmen to fight the same bill that the APWU President Dimondstein endorsed just last week!! That tells me that… THE WRONG GUY WAS ELECTED!!! It sure sounds like Jerry Stidman would have made a much more effective President than the “STUFFED SHIRT” we ended up with?? Let us stand up with “Jerry” and do exactly what he says with the NARFE letter to contact our Congressmen and hopefully we’ll get though this so that we can ELECT THE RIGHT GUY DURING THE NEXT ELECTION!!! Remember “united we stand, divided we fail!” (it doesn’t look like the APWU is currently UNITED!!)

  4. Ididnotvoteforthatguy   February 14, 2017 at 10:17 pm

    Not convinced about the allegations that postal unions support HR 756 only “to improve their ability to sell their health insurance plans.” The bill will basically make Medicare the primary payer while the PS-FEHB becomes secondary. As a result of the “second-payer” status the unions’ health plans would most likely have to reduce plan rates. There will also be healthy competition, as private insurance companies will continue to provide their own plans. How does HR 756 improve the postal unions ability to sell their health insurance plans? If somebody – whether or not campaigning for union office – knows how to explain that, I’d be willing to consider.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.